For nonprofits counting on grants to fund the mission

We find the grants worth pursuing. We screen out the ones you have no real shot at. What survives is your Verified Pipeline.

Every grant is checked against eligibility, funder history, and real fit before it earns a place in your pipeline.

* Typical pipeline target: grants sized 3% to 15% of annual contributed revenue.

Not just the 990s everyone reads. Every verdict draws on federal and state award records, live funder pages and open RFPs, eligibility criteria, and primary-source IRS filings.

Get the Assessment The Grant Funding Viability Assessment: $79 one time. Board-ready in 48 hours.

The Sharke workflow

From every grant identified to every application submitted: one verified path to funding.

FUNDER RELATIONSHIPS Sharke sources them, you build them GRANTS SHARKE FINDS surfaced from documented funder activity GRANTS YOU UNLOCK GRANTS IDENTIFIED including grants you already track SHARKE VERIFIES eligibility / award history / geography / timing RULED OUT cut before staff hours go in each red dot: about 25 hours reclaimed VERIFIED PIPELINE developed and managed by Sharke DRAFT RED TEAM SUBMIT GRANTS IDENTIFIED Sharke finds the grants and surfaces the invite-only funders relationships unlock. SHARKE VERIFIES Checked against eligibility, award history, geography, and timing. RULED OUT about 25 hours back, each VERIFIED PIPELINE Developed and managed by Sharke. DRAFT RED TEAM SUBMIT FUNDING

The Funding Gap

Your pipeline can look full while the mission stays exposed.

Your Funding Gap is the difference between what your mission needs from grants and what your pipeline can actually fund. Here is the math on a $300,000 grant goal.

Your mission needs$300,000
Your pipeline says$1,200,000
Documented path to funding$95,000
0.32xof your goal
documented

A full-looking pipeline, and only a fraction with a real path to funding. That gap is the part no one has shown you.

Funding Gap = your grant goal minus your Verified Pipeline.

Illustrative. The free Funding Path Checkup estimates whether the current pipeline is large enough for the stated grant goal. The Assessment determines what the public record supports and what must be verified next.

25 hrs
of staff time per foundation application
50+ hrs
of staff time per federal application
Same source. The hours go in whether or not the grant ever had a path to funding.

A board can evaluate a documented path to funding. It is much harder to defend a plan built on grants no one verified before staff time was committed.

Before the current pipeline becomes the year's plan, verify what is behind it.

Get the Assessment $79 one time. Board-ready in 48 hours.

Not ready? Measure your Funding Gap free. Five minutes. No signup.

Verify first

The $79 Assessment: can grants actually fund your mission? Know before you commit a quarter of staff time to finding out.

Give us your EIN and your grant goal. In 48 hours, a written Assessment: a decision you can act on, not a status report, every figure sourced to the public record.

Get the Assessment $79 one time. Board-ready in 48 hours.

See everything it returns and sample reports on the Assessment page.

How the Verified Pipeline gets built

Verify the plan. Rule grants in or out. Fill and maintain the gap.

01 / Verify the plan

Determine how much documented pipeline the grant goal requires.

02 / Rule grants in or out

Check current opportunities against eligibility, funder behavior, geography, and timing.

03 / Fill and maintain the gap

Replace weak fits with stronger opportunities and keep the pipeline current as cycles change.

A verification-first workflow with human review. Run it yourself for $159 a month, or Sharke runs it for you from $249 a month, priced by how much of your mission rides on grants. See plans and scope.

Grant searchSharke
Finds opportunitiesVerifies whether they belong
Matches on stated interestsChecks actual funding behavior
Adds to the listRules grants in or out
Leaves research to the teamReturns a source-cited decision
Stops at discoveryReplaces weak fits and maintains the pipeline

The hard part is not generating a list or a draft. It is deciding what deserves staff time.

What a verdict looks like

This is what verification catches.

The Assessment answers whether the path to funding is viable. Decision Records answer whether a specific opportunity belongs in it. Three real verdicts: pursue, wait, or walk away.

Sharke / Decision Record
Pursue

Verified fit

Top 1% by documented fit

Worth your hours

Community Resilience Fund

Family foundation · $150K to $250K · Southwest

Funder behavior, not stated focus

Stated focus: "General health."Actual pattern: 12 of the last 15 awards went to rural youth mental health organizations like yours.Your size, your geography, your issue.

Eligibility and geography: verified compatible (Southwest)

Source: IRS 990-PF Schedule I, 2021 to 2025

Pursue, Wait, or Move on, each with the evidence behind the decision. A Move on verdict is the kind a team can forward straight to a board, sourced to five years of public filings.

After a grant earns its place in the Verified Pipeline, Sharke helps draft and red-teams the application before the funder sees it.

"I've been around grants long enough to know that not every opportunity is worth pursuing, but we usually don't find that out until we're already deep into the work. The review helped us take a harder look at what was actually realistic and where we should focus our limited time. That alone made it worthwhile."

Director of Development · Workforce development nonprofit · $1.2M annual budget

The consequence of delay

If your top funder changed priorities tomorrow, how would the mission continue?

Most teams do not find out until it is too late. In 2025 the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative wound down its advocacy and housing grantmaking; organizations that had planned around renewals were told the funding would not continue. And 69% of nonprofits reported funding cuts from at least one source that year.

A verified pipeline is how a mission absorbs a funder pivot: the next path to funding is already known before it is needed. The Assessment shows whether your current plan could absorb that loss and which funders to verify before the board assumes they will be there.

Source: Center for Effective Philanthropy, A Sector in Crisis (2026); State of Nonprofits 2026.

Who built Sharke

Collin Brown has spent his career building ways to measure things people thought could only be judged by intuition. In mergers and acquisitions, his framework for measuring acquisitiveness helped companies distinguish between deals that created value and deals that destroyed it. The work is still cited in M&A research today.

In grant-seeking, he saw the same problem: organizations were making major funding decisions without a way to measure whether their pipeline had a path to the funding they needed.

Your Funding Gap is that measurement.

He has won grants at both for-profit and nonprofit organizations, from NIH, NSF, and USDA to Meta and Google, including $1M+ in federal awards, and he served in the White House Office of Management and Budget. Wharton MBA. Trained at Duke Sanford School of Public Policy. Author of "AI You Can Actually Trust" (Amazon Top 50 Business Bestseller).

Selected for the 2026 NVIDIA Inception Program

Questions

Before you decide

Why can't my grant writer do this?

A strong grant writer can review fit. But assembling current award history, first-time grantee patterns, budget comparables, geography, timing, and relationship requirements on every opportunity is time-consuming. Sharke makes that verification a standard step before writing begins.

Is this another grant database?

No. Databases help you find opportunities. Sharke determines whether an opportunity belongs in the funding plan before staff time is committed.

Why not just use ChatGPT or Claude to find grants?

A chatbot reasons from a grant's description and whatever you paste in. It has no award records, so it cannot check who a funder actually funds, at what sizes, in which states, or how often a first-time applicant gets in. Sharke's verdicts are checked against more than 3.8 million grant award records and the funder's own filings, and when the record shows no real path to funding, Sharke says Move on. A chatbot will happily keep you optimistic.

Why not use ChatGPT or Claude to write the application?

For prose, they are genuinely useful. The expensive mistake is not the writing, it is spending 20 to 30 hours writing for a grant that never had a real path to funding. Sharke verifies the grant first, helps draft only what earns a place in the Verified Pipeline, and red-teams the application against the funder's criteria, priorities, and past awards before you submit. Your voice stays yours; the weak spots get caught before a funder sees them.

Can Sharke surface funders that never publish open calls?

Yes. Many foundations fund by invitation and relationship, not open RFPs. Sharke reads their actual giving from public filings, surfaces the ones already backing organizations like yours, and tells you which relationships are worth starting early. That is the grants-you-unlock stream in the diagram above: doors that open through relationships, not applications.

Do you guarantee funding?

No. Sharke never predicts awards or promises wins. Verification tells you whether the documented record supports pursuing an opportunity and where the path to funding is weak, incomplete, or closed. On the pipeline plans there is one promise we do make, the Funding Goal Guarantee: If Sharke cannot identify enough verified opportunities and funder relationships to support your funding goal, we continue working at no charge until we do.

What do you need from us?

Your EIN and one line about your organization is all it takes. Sharke works from your public filings, peer grant records, and documented funder activity. Every decision identifies the evidence used and flags what cannot be verified.

What happens if the answer is no?

You still receive a decision path. The Assessment shows where the current plan is exposed, whether to narrow the path first, and which funders or assumptions to verify before more staff time is committed.

The hours are already being spent. The only question is whether they are going to the right grants.

See whether your pipeline can actually reach your funding goal, before the year decides for you.

Get the Grant Funding Viability Assessment

$79 one time. Board-ready in 48 hours.

Not ready for the Assessment? Measure your Funding Gap free.

$79 one time. Board-ready in 48 hours. Get the Assessment